Oh, I can believe it. One does not have to look far to find decisions made without even reference to facts. Too often, critical thinking and objective decision-making are thrown out in favor of ideologies, beliefs, and hearsay. This way of thinking is reinforced by articles like this one.

Read it carefully and you will note the positive affirmations of studies that support circumcision and the use of disclaimers, such as "Though this hasn't been scientifically confirmed," in referencing the negative impacts of circumcision. The article concludes by quoting a "seasoned parent" saying, "Whether a boy is circumcised or not doesn’t matter so much," she says. "He can be healthy, happy and love his penis either way.”

Now, I can agree with the statement that "he can be healthy, happy and love his penis either way." But, I object to the statement that it "doesn't matter so much." That is dismissive and belittling of those who feel harmed by the operation.

It is almost like the article was written from a pro-circumcision point of view, then sprinkled lightly with a few pro-intact arguments that are quickly mashed out of sight with studies and quotes from purportedly "experienced" persons.

I have not yet heard a compelling explanation for what appears to be an ideological hatred of the prepuce in our society.