This was VERY surprising to see a magazine (that I respected) using those bogus studies.
I wonder if there is an agenda on the editorial staff?
You can read their article at: www.time.com/time/specia...0372,00.html
And feel free to provide feedback at: time-blog.com/talkback/fiftytoptens.php
There is already plenty pointing out their error to believe the studies they cite.
I wonder if there is an agenda on the editorial staff?
You can read their article at: www.time.com/time/specia...0372,00.html
And feel free to provide feedback at: time-blog.com/talkback/fiftytoptens.php
There is already plenty pointing out their error to believe the studies they cite.
posted by:
|
SF Bay Area
|
